Conflict of Rights and Interests

Conflict of rights and interests

International human rights law suggests a “balance of rights” approach to assess the legitimacy of state restriction to freedom of expression. The resources on this Module survey the application of this test to various areas of conflict, such as defamation and national security. Readings cover various national practices, and jurisprudence, along with academic critiques.

10 items found, showing 31 - 10

Incitement and Hate speech

Author: Ozias Tungwarara
Media Type Icon

"Systematic monitoring of compliance by governments with commitments made in respect of protection of fundamental rights is an important part of ensuring that the necessary protections are indeed provided.  This paper discusses some issues related to monitoring in the context of an Africa regional workshop convened by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).  The workshop seeks to examine links between article 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) with regard to freedom of expression and incitement to hatred.  The objective is to improve the effectiveness of prohibitions of incitement to national, racial and religious hatred without derogating from the equally important right of freedom of expression."

UN OHCHR, Ozias Tungwara, Institutions and Policies:  Data collection, monitoring and fact finding, 2011 Expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred, Workshop for Africa (Nairobi, 6-7 April 2011)

Author: Ömür Orhun
Media Type Icon

In 2011 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights organized expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred. This document is Ambassador Ömür Orhun's contribution and speaking notes for the event. 

UN, OHCHR, Ömür Orhun, Inter-cultural Dialogue, Media, Freedom of Expression, Mediation and Reconciliation, 2011 Expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred, (Vienna, 9-10 February 2011).

Author: UN, OSCE, OAS and ACHPR Special Rapporteurs for Freedom of Expression
Media Type Icon

Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Countering Violent Extremism.

UN, OSCE, OAS and ACHPR Special Rapporteurs for Freedom of Expression. Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Countering Violent Extremism, May 3, 2016.

Author: United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Representative on Freedom of the Media, and the Organization of American States Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression
Media Type Icon

On 30 April 2020, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Representative on Freedom of the Media, and the Organization of American States Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression published the Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Elections in the Digital Age. The Declaration enumerates recommendations regarding communication during elections for both, State as well as non-State actors. In pursuance of the publication of this Declaration, Toby Mendel, Executive Director of the Centre for Law and Democracy, noted, “The Joint Declaration breaks new ground in several respects…Some key areas it addresses include extending certain types of rules which apply to legacy media, such as on spending and transparency, to digital media, respecting the right to privacy when using personal data to micro-target messages and, for digital actors, avoiding measures which limit the diversity of information available to users or the ability of certain parties and candidates to disseminate messages.”

United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe Representative on Freedom of the Media, and the Organization of American States Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression. “Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Elections in the Digital Age”. 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Opinion/JointDeclarationDigitalAge_30April2020_EN.pdf.

Author: UN Special Rapporteur Heiner Bielefeldt, UN Special Rapporteur Frank La Rue, UN Special Rapporteur Githu Muigai
Media Type Icon

In 2011 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights organized expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred. The Special Rapporteurs on freedom of opinion and expression, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, and the Special Rapporteur on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, presented a joint submission. In this written submission, the Special Rapporteurs "first explore some legislative and judicial practices in the region of the workshop, i.e. in Europe, as well as policies conducive to effectively prohibit and prevent advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence (chapter II). [The Special Rapporteurs] then provide some concluding remarks concerning the protection of individuals against incitement to national, racial or religious hatred (chapter III).

UN OHCHR, UN Special Rapportuers Heiner Bielefeldt, Frank La Rue and Githu Muigai, Joint submission by the Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, and the Special Rapporteur on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, 2011.

Author: UNESCO, Avani Singh
Media Type Icon

This toolkit for judicial officials in Africa on international and regional standards on freedom of expression "encompasses a broad variety of issues, which should be considered by judi-cial actors in the course of their work to protect human rights. It covers legal standards of freedom of expression according to international and regional instruments and core texts and surveys pertinent jurisprudence on freedom of expression from regional and sub-regional courts or quasi-judicial bodies that deal with human rights issues.

The toolkit explicates conditions under which speech can be legitimately restricted, while also giving prominence to the safety of journalists and the issue of impunity, the latter representing one of the main obstacles to guaranteeing freedom of expression and freedom of information. Finally, the toolkit also addresses recent challenges to freedom of expression on the internet, including on social media, which have become vital means for sharing information and expressing views. The question of gender representation in media content and careers, and gender-specific threats for women journalists, are also addressed.The protection of freedom of expression requires the active efforts of a great variety of actors. While this toolkit has been conceived primarily for judges, prosecutors, trainers of judges, lawyers and other legal experts, it is my hope that civil society actors, members of security forces and media professionals will also find its contents of great value to their work. Given the importance of freedom of expression as a foundational value of free societies, I believe the toolkit’s material and messages will be of relevance to all concerned stakeholders — that is to say, to all individuals everywhere."

 

Author: Ricardo Lombana
Media Type Icon

In 2011 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights organized expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred. This document is Ricardo Lombana's contribution to the expert meeting held in Santiago, Chile.

UN OHCHR, Ricardo Lombana, Media self-regulation as a mechanism to fight incitement to hatred, 2011 Expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred, Workshop for the Americas (Santiago, 12 and 13 October 2011)

Author: Center for Law and Democracy
Media Type Icon

These training materials prepared by The Centre for Law and Democracy focus on three commonly applied restrictions on freedom of expression under international human rights law. They are designed as a resource for professional networks of media lawyers and other organisations working to build the capacity of lawyers to defend media freedom. The Materials consist of: 1) a Background Reading document describing core standards for each type of restriction; 2) sample exercises that can be used during training programmes; 3) discussion questions, also for use during trainings; and 4) sample agendas for a one and one-half hour or one-half-day workshop based on the materials.

The Centre for Law and Democracy (CLD). Model Training Materials: Hate Speech, Defamation and National Security. December 20, 2022. Accessed January 13, 2023. https://www.law-democracy.org/live/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Training-Materials-2.Content-Restrictions.FINAL_.pdf

Author: Centre for Human Rights at University of Pretoria, Pansy Tlakula
Media Type Icon

In this segment of the MOOC 'International and African Legal Framework on Freedom of Expression, Access to Information and the Safety of Journalists' developed by the Centre for Human Rights, University of Pretoria with the support of UNESCO, Pansy Tlakula talks about freedom of expression and hate speech.

This segment is part of Module 5: Protecting freedom of expression in the digital age.

Author: Nazila Ghanea
Media Type Icon

In 2011 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights organized expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred. This document is Nazila Ghanea's contribution to the workshop, it focuses on the Nature and means of effective remedies.

UN OHCHR, Nazila Ghanea, Nature and means of effective remedies, 2011 Expert workshops on the prohibition of incitement to national, racial or religious hatred, (Vienna, 9-10 February 2011).